Rethinking the influencer

By Molly Flatt

A couple of recent articles have posed a timely challenge to the concept of what sort of person is most important to a brand in spreading word of mouth. The three most likely qualities you will hear cited for ‘influencers’ is that they must be 1) highly active content creators 2) well connected with big, strong networks and 3) already interested in and advocating your brand. Of course, this makes a lot of sense, but there’s also evidence to show that companies might be neglecting other equally, or more, important behavioural types.

Over on Social Media Today, Francois Gossieaux has highlighted a couple of whitepapers (here and here) by Yale academics David Godes and Dina Mayzlin, which found that the impact of WOM on sales was greater when it came from non-loyal customers than loyal ones. When you think about it, it makes sense – while loyal advocates’ networks may have got used to their recommendations, a new or uncharacteristic nod from a previously uninterested or derogatory person can hold a lot of impact.

Seem sensible? Remind yourself of the importance business giant Peter Drucker put on non-customers, and consider the three ‘tiers’ these untapped conversationalists fall into courtesy of Blue Ocean Strategy below.
Morevoer, the studies also found that among those non-loyal conversationalists, it was less likely to be the opinion leaders talking about a new product – more the regular members of the ‘herd.’ That brings us on neatly to Mark Earls, author of Herd: the hidden truth about who we are, who recently remarked:

‘It’s not that what people say to each other isn’t important in shaping our behaviour. Nor, indeed that recommendation (or advocacy or whatever you call it) in particular, is completely irrelevant. It’s just that the really important mechanism lies in what other people see, hear and feel going on around them: it’s in the eyes and ears of the advocate’s peers and not in the words of the advocate or recommendor. It’s at the “influenced” end of the telescope and not the “influencer”.’

Here at 1000heads we emphasise the importance of achieving breadth and depth, as well as reaching out to untouched frontier audiences, in our work for every one of our clients. So if you’re spending all your time focusing on the same old ‘influencers’, take a moment to think about everyone else, and how you can connect with them – past customers, detractors, prospects, people from very different passion groups, and the thousands of us who prefer to follow rather than lead.

Like this?

  • iamluca

    Very insightful article.

    When you read the context you think it sounds like common sense, but it's basic fundamentals that everyone just seems to ignore.

    Understanding your core market is so key, to be able to recognize who the 20% of your network are that will handle 80% of your marketing.

    I've added 1000heads to my blog roll on my site.

    Great article Molly.

  • mollyflatt

    Thanks very much. The common sense bit is what gets me every time. We all know how conversation works, how and where we are influenced ourselves, the complex ways in which WOM impacts upon us and what drives us to share. Why do we lose this basic knowledge when we start to talk about conversation and business?!

  • http://www.1000heads.com/2010/04/thoughts-on-propagation-planning/ 1000heads :: The Word of Mouth People

    [...] recently explained Why Spreadability Beats Reach for WOM UK, and here at 1000heads we often blog our thoughts on this topic as everything we do aims to engage with both breadth and depth. As I like to say, our focus is on [...]

  • http://www.1000heads.com/2010/09/what-sort-of-social-network-actually-influences-behaviour/ 1000heads :: The Word of Mouth People

    [...] always emphasised the need for multiple entry points with a word of mouth campaign, to foster both deep and broad engagement to ensure both rapid visibility and concrete behaviour change, leading to sales, [...]